BIM Coordination Services
Optimar Precon supports contractors, subcontractors, architects, engineers and BIM/VDC teams with multidisciplinary BIM coordination across architectural, structural and MEP models.
Our team federates Revit and IFC models, reviews coordination issues, supports clash resolution and tracks model updates through structured coordination cycles using project-specific BIM requirements and workflows.
- Federated architectural, structural and MEP models
- Revit BIM coordination and model review cycles
- Issue tracking through coordination closeout
Share Your Coordination Requirements
Send your current models, BIM Execution Plan, disciplines, coordination priorities, software versions, review schedule and required outputs.
What Are BIM Coordination Services?
BIM coordination services bring architectural, structural and MEP model information into a common coordination environment so project teams can review interfaces, responsibilities, model changes and unresolved issues across disciplines.
The process can include 3D BIM coordination, federated model coordination, Revit model review, issue assignment, coordination meetings, revision tracking and coordination closeout.
A BIM coordination service combines architectural, structural and MEP models into a federated environment, identifies coordination issues, assigns them to the relevant disciplines and tracks revisions through repeated review cycles. The process may include clash detection, coordination meetings, issue logs, Revit model updates and final coordination validation before construction.
Multiple discipline models reviewed in one coordination environment
Architectural, structural and MEP information can be federated so teams can review model interfaces, responsibilities, revisions and coordination priorities against the agreed project workflow.
Coordination outputs defined around the project review cycle
Deliverables depend on the BIM Execution Plan, model maturity, participating disciplines, coordination schedule and required issue management process.
Federated Coordination Model
Architectural, structural and MEP models combined for multidisciplinary review using agreed coordinates and model versions.
Coordination Issue Register
Relevant model issues documented with discipline responsibility, status, viewpoints and review information.
Reviewed Model Updates
Revised model information incorporated from approved coordination decisions and subsequent discipline submissions.
Coordination Meeting Support
Viewpoints, model issues and status information organized to support scheduled multidisciplinary coordination reviews.
Resolution Tracking
Issue status tracked across repeated model submissions so open, reviewed and approved items remain visible to the project team.
Coordination Closeout Package
Final agreed model set and issue status prepared around the project’s defined coordination closeout requirements.
Revit models reviewed through structured coordination cycles
Revit BIM coordination services can support model federation, discipline-model review and repeated model updates while maintaining the coordinates, worksharing requirements, model breakdown and software versions defined for the project.
- Revit discipline model review
- Shared-coordinate alignment
- Model version control
- Linked-model coordination
- Issue-driven revision cycles
- Federated model exchanges
Need broader model-development support in addition to coordination? Explore our BIM Services for multidisciplinary BIM production capabilities.
Model Federation and Multidiscipline BIM Coordination
Our 3D BIM coordination services bring separate architectural, structural and MEP models into a shared review environment so model interfaces, trade responsibilities, revisions and unresolved coordination issues can be managed through structured review cycles.
Federated Model Coordination
Current discipline models are combined using the agreed coordinates, software versions and project model structure before multidisciplinary review begins.
- Architectural, structural and MEP federation
- Shared-coordinate review
- Model-version checks
- Discipline-model alignment
Multidiscipline 3D Coordination
Model interfaces are reviewed against the project coordination priorities so relevant spatial, access and discipline issues can be documented for the responsible project teams.
- Trade-interface review
- Routing and spatial coordination
- Access and clearance review
- Discipline responsibility tracking
Issue and Revision Management
Coordination issues can be assigned, reviewed and tracked across repeated model exchanges until the project reaches its defined coordination closeout stage.
- Issue ownership and status
- Review comments and viewpoints
- Approved model revisions
- Coordination closeout tracking
A typical coordination cycle from model intake to closeout
The exact sequence follows the project BIM Execution Plan, coordination schedule and responsibility matrix, but most multidisciplinary coordination cycles include these stages.
Model intake
Confirm current discipline files, revisions, coordinates, software versions and model responsibilities.
Federation
Combine the required architectural, structural and MEP models in the agreed coordination environment.
Model review
Review model interfaces and run the clash checks specified for the current coordination cycle.
Issue resolution
Assign relevant issues to responsible disciplines and track approved project decisions.
Closeout review
Review revised models and outstanding issue status against the defined coordination-closeout requirements.
BIM Coordination vs Clash Detection
Clash detection is one technical activity within the wider BIM coordination process. BIM coordination continues beyond identifying conflicts by managing responsibilities, meetings, model revisions and issue closeout.
| BIM Coordination | Clash Detection |
|---|---|
| Manages the complete multidisciplinary coordination process | Identifies defined model conflicts |
| Combines architectural, structural and MEP models | Runs defined clash tests against selected model elements |
| Assigns coordination issues to responsible disciplines | Categorizes identified hard, soft or clearance issues |
| Supports multidisciplinary coordination meetings | Produces clash-test outputs and reports |
| Tracks model updates and issue resolution | Checks whether defined conflicts remain in later models |
| Continues through the agreed coordination closeout process | Forms one stage within the wider coordination workflow |
Need detailed clash-test workflows, hard and soft clash review, Navisworks tests and clash-report requirements? Those topics belong on the dedicated specialist service page rather than being duplicated here.
BIM Clash Detection ServicesModel issues should reach the right project participants
BIM coordination meeting support can organize the current model status, relevant viewpoints, assigned issues and open decisions so project teams can review the items that require action.
- Current model status
- Open coordination issues
- Assigned discipline responsibility
- Review viewpoints
- Previous-action status
- Required model revisions
- Next exchange date
- Closeout status
Preparing for a multidisciplinary coordination cycle?
Share the current discipline models, BIM Execution Plan, responsibility matrix, software versions, coordination priorities and review schedule for a technical scope review.
What Information Is Needed to Start BIM Coordination?
BIM coordination should begin with current discipline models, defined responsibilities and a clear review process. The model set, BIM Execution Plan, software environment, coordination rules and exchange schedule establish how each coordination cycle will operate.
| Project input | Coordination use | Why it matters |
|---|---|---|
| Current architectural, structural and MEP models | Federated model creation | Establishes the discipline information included in the current coordination cycle. |
| BIM Execution Plan | Coordination workflow setup | Defines project requirements, model procedures, responsibilities and information exchanges. |
| Responsibility matrix | Issue assignment | Identifies which discipline or project participant should review specific coordination issues. |
| Shared coordinates and model breakdown | Model federation | Supports consistent positioning and organization of discipline models within the coordination environment. |
| Coordination rules and priorities | Model review | Establishes which interfaces, clearances and model relationships require review. |
| Model exchange and meeting schedule | Review-cycle planning | Defines when updated models, issue information and coordination reviews are expected. |
Coordination requirements vary by project. The agreed BIM scope should define which models, disciplines, software versions, exchanges and project participants form part of each review cycle.
Coordination should follow the project BIM requirements
Optimar Precon can configure coordination production around the BIM Execution Plan and other project requirements supplied for the assignment. The BEP provides the framework for how models and coordination information should be managed.
- Model naming and file conventions
- Shared coordinates, levels and grids
- Discipline responsibilities
- Required model and software versions
- Coordination and review milestones
- Issue-management requirements
- Required model-exchange formats
Coordination depends on controlled model exchanges
Where the client provides access to a Common Data Environment, coordination activities can follow the project’s defined model sharing, review and revision process.
- Current approved or shared model versions
- Discipline model submission dates
- Controlled file and folder structures
- Model review and comment workflows
- Issue-status and revision visibility
- Coordination meeting information
- Scheduled model exchanges
Optimar Precon can work against client-supplied BIM standards, protocols and project requirements. The coordination service should not be interpreted as blanket certification or universal compliance with every code, standard or information-management framework.
When Should Contractors Outsource BIM Coordination?
External BIM coordination support can add production and review capacity when the existing contractor or BIM/VDC team needs help managing defined model coordination workloads.
Internal team at capacity
Additional coordination support can cover defined model packages while the internal BIM/VDC team retains project control.
Multiple trades need federation
Architectural, structural and MEP submissions may require repeated federation and multidisciplinary review.
Compressed coordination deadlines
Additional production capacity can support scheduled review cycles when several coordination packages are due together.
Repeated model updates
New discipline submissions may require federation, issue review and status updates across multiple iterations.
Meeting support is needed
Coordination viewpoints, issue status and current model information can be organized for scheduled review meetings.
Outsourcing adds coordination capacity, not transferred design responsibility
The contractor, consultants and responsible trades retain control of design decisions, engineering responsibility, trade priorities, field verification and final project approvals.
Architectural, Structural and MEP BIM Coordination
Preconstruction BIM coordination reviews how separate discipline models interact within the same project environment. Each discipline retains its own design responsibility while shared interfaces, clearances, penetrations and model revisions are managed through the coordination process.
Architectural Model Coordination
Architectural models establish many of the spatial, opening, ceiling and room conditions against which structural and MEP information is reviewed.
- Walls and ceiling interfaces
- Openings and service zones
- Equipment-space interfaces
- Architectural revision review
Structural Model Coordination
Structural information is reviewed with other discipline models to identify interfaces involving framing, slabs, openings, penetrations and required service routes.
- Beam and service interfaces
- Slab and wall penetrations
- Structural opening coordination
- Model revision interfaces
MEP Model Coordination
Mechanical, electrical and plumbing models can be coordinated against the architectural, structural and other building-services information included in the project model set.
- Duct, pipe and containment routing
- Ceiling-zone coordination
- Plant and equipment interfaces
- Access and clearance review
What does multidisciplinary coordination review?
3D coordination services should focus on the interfaces that matter to the current project stage and participating disciplines rather than applying the same review criteria to every model element.
Review whether participating systems occupy the same required project space or affect defined clearances.
Identify interfaces where services pass through structural or architectural elements for project-team review.
Review defined maintenance, equipment and installation access requirements where they form part of the coordination scope.
Compare updated discipline submissions with current coordination issues and required model-review priorities.
Projects requiring deeper mechanical, electrical and plumbing model development should use the dedicated MEP specialist page for discipline-specific scope rather than extending this coordination page into detailed MEP modeling content.
MEP BIM ServicesHow are BIM coordination models reviewed before closeout?
Coordination QA should confirm that the correct model versions, coordinates, discipline submissions and issue statuses have been reviewed against the agreed project requirements before the coordination cycle is closed.
Coordination QA checks
Review criteria depend on the project BIM requirements, but these checks commonly form part of model coordination QA.
- Current discipline-model versions
- Shared coordinates reviewed
- Required disciplines included
- Model naming checked
- Open issue status reviewed
- Approved revisions incorporated
- Required viewpoints prepared
- Exchange formats checked
Coordination closeout reflects the agreed models, review rules, tolerances, information available and issue decisions at that stage. Design approval, field verification, engineering responsibility and final construction decisions remain with the responsible project parties.
Need architectural, structural and MEP models reviewed together?
Share the current model set, discipline responsibilities, coordination priorities and required closeout outputs for a project-specific scope review.
BIM Coordination Software, Model Exchanges and Revit Workflows
Coordination software supports model federation, review and issue management, but the project workflow still depends on controlled model versions, shared coordinates, defined responsibilities and agreed information exchanges.
Tools selected around the project BIM environment
Required software versions and access should be confirmed before the coordination cycle begins so participating discipline models can be reviewed in the intended authoring and federation environment.
Autodesk Revit
Discipline-model authoring, linked-model review, model updates and Revit-based coordination workflows.
Navisworks Manage
Federated model review, model aggregation, coordination viewpoints and project-defined clash testing.
Autodesk Construction Cloud
Model sharing and review workflows where the client provides the required project access and permissions.
AutoCAD and Drawing Inputs
Supporting DWG information can be reviewed alongside the model environment where it forms part of the coordination scope.
Common coordination exchanges
Exact versions, naming rules and export settings should follow the project BIM requirements.
- RVT
- IFC
- NWC
- NWD
- DWG
Revit models within a multidisciplinary coordination workflow
Revit coordination services can support repeated discipline-model exchanges while maintaining the coordinates, links, model breakdown, revision status and software versions defined for the project. Revit authoring remains one part of the wider BIM coordination process.
- Linked discipline models
- Shared-coordinate review
- Model revision checks
- Required workset structure
- Model exchange preparation
- Approved coordination updates
Information produced during a BIM coordination cycle
Required outputs should be agreed before the review begins so the project team receives the model, issue and meeting information needed for the next coordination decision.
Federated model
Current participating discipline models assembled for the agreed multidisciplinary review.
Issue information
Coordination issues organized with viewpoints, responsibility, review status and required project action.
Meeting review set
Current viewpoints, open items and model status organized for the scheduled coordination meeting.
Updated model package
Revised model information prepared from approved coordination decisions and subsequent discipline updates.
Coordination tools help teams review and communicate model information. Design decisions, engineering changes, trade priorities and final approval remain with the responsible client-appointed project participants.
Need support with Revit or federated-model coordination?
Share the current model formats, software versions, BIM Execution Plan, coordination schedule and required review outputs for a technical scope review.
BIM Coordination Support Built Around the Project Workflow
BIM coordination works best when model responsibilities, software, review cycles, issue ownership and required outputs are defined before coordination begins. Our production support can follow those project-specific requirements throughout repeated model exchanges.
Multidiscipline model review
Architectural, structural and MEP models can be federated and reviewed within the coordination framework established for the project.
Revit and federated workflows
Coordination production can support Revit model exchanges, federation and Navisworks-based review using the required project software versions.
Structured issue tracking
Relevant coordination issues can be recorded with responsibility, viewpoints and status information through repeated review cycles.
Defined responsibility boundaries
BIM production support remains separate from engineering approval, trade decisions, field verification and final project acceptance.
What can a BIM coordination review package contain?
Required deliverables vary by project, but a coordination package can combine the current federated model, issue information, meeting viewpoints and model status for the agreed review cycle.
This is an illustrative output structure. It is not presented as a client case study or a verified completed-project result.
Current multidisciplinary model set
Architectural, structural and MEP models combined using the project-approved model versions and coordination setup.
Assigned coordination issues
Relevant items recorded with viewpoints, discipline ownership, review status and required project action.
Coordination review viewpoints
Selected model views and open issues organized around the topics requiring discussion during the coordination meeting.
Coordination status update
Current open, reviewed, approved or transferred issue status recorded against the latest model exchange.
BIM coordination can continue through repeated review cycles
The required support depends on when the coordination team becomes involved and how the project’s model exchange and responsibility process has been structured.
Initial coordination setup
Review the model set, shared coordinates, project requirements, discipline responsibilities and coordination priorities.
Active coordination cycles
Federate updated discipline models, review relevant interfaces and prepare issue information for project-team decisions.
Coordination closeout
Review the agreed final model set and record outstanding issue status against the defined closeout requirements.
Optimar Precon can review and coordinate model information using the inputs and project requirements supplied for the assignment. Design approval, engineering responsibility, trade decisions, statutory compliance, field verification and final acceptance remain with the client and its appointed project professionals.
BIM Coordination Services FAQs
These answers cover common questions about multidisciplinary model coordination, Revit workflows, coordination meetings, BIM requirements and clash detection.
What do BIM coordination services include?
BIM coordination services can include architectural, structural and MEP model federation, multidisciplinary model review, coordination issue assignment, meeting support, revision tracking and coordination closeout. Clash detection may form one stage of the wider coordination workflow.
What is the difference between BIM coordination and clash detection?
Clash detection identifies defined model conflicts using agreed test rules. BIM coordination manages the broader process around those models, including federation, discipline responsibilities, coordination meetings, issue assignment, model revisions and closeout tracking.
Can you support Revit BIM coordination services?
Yes. Revit BIM coordination services can support linked discipline-model review, shared-coordinate checks, repeated model exchanges and approved coordination updates. Required Revit versions, model structure and exchange requirements should be defined for the project before production begins.
What information is needed before BIM coordination starts?
Typical inputs include the current architectural, structural and MEP models, BIM Execution Plan, shared coordinates, responsibility matrix, software versions, coordination rules, model exchange schedule, meeting dates and required outputs. The final requirements depend on the agreed project scope.
Can you support BIM coordination meetings and issue tracking?
BIM coordination meeting support can include organizing current model status, viewpoints, open issues, assigned discipline responsibility and previous-action status. Approved project decisions can then be reflected in later model revisions and subsequent coordination reviews.
Share Your Coordination Scope
Send the available architectural, structural and MEP models, BIM Execution Plan, software versions, coordination priorities, responsibility requirements and review schedule so the BIM coordination scope can be assessed against the information provided.